Editorial Policy

Updated August 2026

People find this site under a court deadline, and a wrong answer here can cost someone a license. This page explains how we research, how we handle uncertainty, and why money never moves a ranking.

The ⚠ rule

Every figure on this site is either sourced or flagged. When we can trace a requirement, duration, or fee to a state agency page or statute, we cite it. When we can’t — because the state doesn’t publish it, or the practice varies by county, or a provider won’t quote publicly — we mark it with and say what we don’t know.

We would rather look uncertain than be confidently wrong. “Usually 6 months to 2 years, set by the court ⚠” is more useful to someone facing a judge than a clean number we invented.

How a state page gets built

  1. Start at the state’s own DMV / DPS / licensing agency page for ignition interlock requirements.
  2. Trace the rule to its statute or administrative code section and cite the section number.
  3. Cross-check the state’s official list of certified device providers — we only list providers the state approves.
  4. Gather cost data from provider quotes and published fee schedules, presented as ranges, never as a promised price.
  5. Use the state’s own vocabulary (DWI in Texas, OWI in Wisconsin, OVI in Ohio, BAIID in Illinois) so the page matches what readers and courts actually say.
  6. Flag every unverified item with ⚠, publish the source list, and record the verification date.

Sources we use, in order

Source hierarchy
1. PrimaryState statutes, administrative codes, and DMV/DPS/licensing agency pages and forms.
2. Official secondaryState court websites, county clerk instructions, NHTSA and state highway-safety office publications.
3. Provider dataCertified providers’ published pricing, service-center lists, and quotes — labeled as provider-supplied.
4. Not accepted aloneOther comparison sites, forums, AI-generated summaries, or a provider’s marketing claim about the law. These can point us at a source; they can’t be the source.

Updates and corrections

State pages are reviewed on a quarterly cycle, and immediately when we learn of a change to a statute, fee, or provider’s certification status. The “Updated” date on a page changes only when we actually re-verified it — we don’t refresh dates for SEO.

If we publish something wrong, we correct it and note the change. Send corrections with the page URL and an official source to corrections@ignition-interlock-compare.com; these go to the front of the queue.

How rankings and recommendations work

Provider comparisons are based on state certification, coverage and service-center density, total cost over a realistic term (install + monthly + calibration + removal + state fees — not the teaser monthly rate), contract and billing transparency, and documented customer-service patterns.

What compensation can and can’t do
Can’t buyA ranking, a rating, a “best for” pick, a comparison winner, or the removal of a criticism.
Can affectWhether a call button appears next to a provider — we can only route calls to companies we have a referral relationship with.
Always disclosedCompensation is disclosed on every page and explained in full in our advertising disclosure.
Named regardlessIf a state approves a provider we earn nothing from, we still list it, because leaving it out would make the page wrong.

Tone: no moralizing

We don’t lecture readers about drinking and driving. People arriving here have already been through the court system; they need logistics, cost, and a phone number. We write in plain language, avoid scare tactics, and never use fear to push a call.

What we won’t publish

  • Anything that helps a person tamper with, bypass, or trick an interlock device.
  • A claim that a device is “required in all cases” — or not required — without a source.
  • Guaranteed prices, guaranteed outcomes, or promises about what a judge will do.
  • Fabricated reviews, invented statistics, or provider marketing copy presented as our research.

Who writes and reviews

Fill this in before launch. Name the author and any subject-matter reviewer, with relevant background and a way to contact them. In a legal-adjacent niche, an unnamed author undercuts both reader trust and search performance. See About us.

Think we got something wrong? Send us the correction → We’d rather hear it from you than leave it up.
Related: Advertising Disclosure · Privacy Policy · Terms of Use. Informational only, not legal advice.